VIETNAM LEGALIZES SAME-SEX MARRIAGE. ALMOST.

Thứ Hai, 25 Tháng Mười Một 201300:00(Xem: 17285)
VIETNAM LEGALIZES SAME-SEX MARRIAGE. ALMOST.
It's no longer illegal to "marry" your same sex partner in Vietnam. Vietnam has legalized gay weddings.

Same-sex couples in Vietnam can now organize weddings and they have the right to live together. So, the couples can have a traditional Vietnamese marriage celebration, though this type of marriage has no force of law. The only benefit to this new permission is that same-sex couples can be openly recognized as partners in life.

No Southeast Asian country recognizes same-sex marriages. Thailand and some other countries have always allowed same-sex couples to have traditional, non-legal weddings but this has not been possible in Vietnam until recently. Now in Vietnam, same-sex couples can have their wedding receptions, the board outside the restaurant can have their names as a "married" couple, and they can have the balloons and champagne towers just like other couples. But they can't get a marriage certificate.

In Asia, only Vietnam has made an official announcement regarding same-sex unions. Gay rights supporters believe it is a "large" small step on the path to equal rights. The Government has taken this step after two fines were handed out to a gay and lesbian couple who chose to have a marriage ceremony in Kien Giang and Ca Mau.

The Australian government does not yet allow same-sex marriages. Instead of that, they recognize Civil Partnerships. This means that the two people are officially recognized as a couple for health and social benefits, pensions and inheritance and other legal matters, but they still cannot get a marriage certificate in Australia.

New Zealand is the closest country to Vietnam that allows same-sex marriages. It is the only such country in the Asia-Pacific area to do so.

Social acceptance of same-sex marriages is something else to be considered. Most Vietnamese people do not understand such relationships and do not approve of them. Same-sex couples who celebrate their relationship publicly will still need to overcome the negative attitudes of society.

 Indeed, no one can fully understand the reason for the recent government permission for same-sex weddings. There is no need for the government to gain support of LGBT groups. If the LGBT groups or individuals become an annoyance to the government , they will be quickly silenced.

 One theory is that somewhere in the government there are people who hope to see same-sex marriages become legal in Vietnam and if they are, it will be a boost to the tourist industry of Vietnam. Gay couples will come from many countries to benefit from a marriage equality law.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q.1. For immigration purposes, is there any benefit for same-sex couples to have a traditional Vietnamese wedding celebration?
 A.1. The traditional wedding celebration in Vietnam could be used as additional evidence of relationship, and this might be important in same-sex fiancée cases.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q.2. If the same-sex couple has a traditional marriage, can a fiancée petition still be filed?
A.2. A fiancée petition can still be filed, because the traditional marriage has no force in law.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q.3. If a Vietnamese national and overseas Vietnamese marry officially in New Zealand, can the sponsor file a spouse petition?
 A.3. The sponsor can file a spouse petition if the marriage is legally recognized in the country where it was performed. So, an American citizen or permanent resident can file a spouse petition if the marriage was performed in New Zealand or any other country that allows same-sex marriages.

ROBERT MULLINS INTERNATIONAL www.rmiodp.com
Immigration Support Services-Tham Van Di Tru

9070 Bolsa Avenue, Westminster CA 92683 (714) 890-9933 
779 Story Road, Ste. 70, San Jose, CA 95122 (408) 294-3888 
6930 65th St. Ste. #105, Sacramento CA 95823 (916) 393-3388 
Cty Rang Mi: 47 Phung Khac Khoan, Q1, HCM (848) 3914-7638

Thứ Năm, 09 Tháng Bảy 2015(Xem: 9902)
Does travel outside the United States affect permanent resident status and does it increase the waiting time for Naturalization?
Thứ Tư, 01 Tháng Bảy 2015(Xem: 10288)
Who will benefit with the Supreme Court Ruling on Same-Sex Marriage?
Thứ Tư, 17 Tháng Sáu 2015(Xem: 15439)
As a battered spouse, you may apply for your Green Card under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). The VAWA provisions allow certain spouses of U.S.
Thứ Tư, 10 Tháng Sáu 2015(Xem: 11601)
The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has announced a rule that will now make it possible for dependents of F-1 students to study in the United States on a limited basis.
Thứ Ba, 26 Tháng Năm 2015(Xem: 10746)
The US-Vietnamese Adoption Program was resumed last year. There were three important aspects to this new program, now called the Special Adoption Program:
Thứ Năm, 21 Tháng Năm 2015(Xem: 12185)
The White House has announced that President Obama has done all that he can to change immigration policy through executive action.
Thứ Năm, 14 Tháng Năm 2015(Xem: 29897)
More than 4.4 million people are on the legal immigrant visa waiting list according to the State Department.
Thứ Tư, 06 Tháng Năm 2015(Xem: 11578)
For Vietnamese immigrants, there are two basic categories that offer a Green Card: Family sponsored immigrants and Employment based immigrants.
Thứ Tư, 29 Tháng Tư 2015(Xem: 10733)
Last year, the news reports said that Vietnam — a communist nation that shows little regard for basic human rights — has become the first Southeast Asian country to lift its ban on same-sex marriage.
Thứ Tư, 22 Tháng Tư 2015(Xem: 12068)
The injunction that is holding up the start of the New DACA and the DAPA was not lifted at the appeals court hearing on 17 April.